deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
Shop Similar Prints
This Print Not Available
Download Image
JPG, 3600×2400
more ▶

More from ~gromyko

Featured in Groups:

Details

July 25, 2010
1.9 MB
3600×2400
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 12
Favourites: 43 [who?]

Views: 1,024 (0 today)
Downloads: 54 (0 today)
[x]
:icongromyko:
The ShameFaced Remostrator
(anagram of the massacre of modern art)

digital collaboration with George Tesseleneu of Romania
George :iconhrn: sent me the three layered skull and i build up the whole picture to place his piece on it...

My utter distaste for modern art, is now avenged....

fave :iconhrn: here--->

____

'The important thing to remember in all this is that artistic talent had
become, strictly speaking, non-essential. It helped, but promotion by a
good publicist helped more. The artist had to be a showman rather than a
skilled craftsman.

The ...successful
contemporary artist needs to be a person devoid of moral scruples.
Confidence trickster, hustler, prostitute, pimp, he needs to mix with
the right crowd and know whom to cultivate. “The artist who would be
known,” wrote the great folklorist Joseph Campbell, “has to go to
cocktail parties to win commissions, and those who win them are not in
their studios but at parties, meeting the right people and appearing in
the right places.” Campbell was later accused of anti-Semitism, but
Jewish artist Julian Schnabel backs up Campbell’s claim. “Much time is
spent nurturing liaisons with creatures of the art world,” he notes
gloomily. “There is no time for friendship. Later, there is no capacity
for it.”How does a really talented artist succeed in such a rat race?Painter
Helen Frankenthaler had to sleep with art critic Clement Greenberg, but
it was worth it: Greenberg gave her good reviews. Willem de Kooning let
his wife Elaine bed down with art critic Harold Rosenberg, but it was
worth it: Rosenberg gave de Kooning good reviews. Jackson Pollock had to
pleasure nymphomaniac Peggy Guggenheim, but it was worth it: her
patronage helped to get Pollock good reviews. After all, her daddy owned
the Guggenheim Museum. None of these artists slept around for
love. They did it for money. Jackson Pollock famously said of Peggy
Guggenheim, his plutocratic patroness: “To fuck her, you’d have to put a
towel over her head. And she did want fucking.”Be prepared to
prostitute yourself if you’re a woman or pimp your wife if you’re a man.
Be prepared to do a Piss Christ like Andres Serrano or a pornographic
Holy Virgin Mary like Chris Ofili. Be prepared, like Grayson Perry, to
dress up as a woman and produce sexually perverted pots. Be prepared to
pull a paper scroll out of your vagina like Carolee Schneemann. Be
prepared, like Vito Acconci, to titillate a jaded public by masturbating
for them in a prestigious art gallery — and calling it ‘art’. Let
art critic Clement Greenberg have the last word: “I’ve decided the kind
of people attracted to art are often psychopaths. You can quote me on
that.” "
Add a Comment:
 
:iconmbkkr:
I guess it's about power as well. Power over the artist knowing they want to make a living from art and be willing to do everything for it. So they become a excentric playtoy that looks interesting for the incrowd of the artworld.
On the other hand the artist probably knows this, it's just a big game that will be played by artists who are more interested in money then personal growth through there art.
Reply
:iconpoison-stripes:
~Poison-Stripes Aug 18, 2010  Hobbyist General Artist
Wow. Just wow. Amazing.
Reply
:iconlucarossimartini:
Fantastic artwork!
Reply
:iconkidkovdrop:
I apologize in advance; I am in a mood this morning…
I recently read some, yet More, criticism of modern art/artists, about how corrupt it all is, etc. My reaction to this is always the same: 1st, it is a logical fallacy to condemn the art work on the basis of one’s perceived business ethics of the creator of the art. If you don’t like the painting, fine, you don’t like the painting. Unless the painting is conveying a specific “message” in a literal sense that you object to, what difference does the artist’s business dealings have to do with it? Secondly, yeah, like art is a corrupt business, unlike other businesses, eh? I’m not so sure artists have the corner on the corruption market. I think people expect them to be like priests or holy people because they are artists, and they see their corruption as particularly hypocritical. I’m sorry, but I just get sick of that whole crappy argument! Then it follows that self-expression becomes a dirty or superficial term. Fuck these critics and their self-righteous, pseudo-intellectual, egotistical sermons on taste and ethics. They either couldn’t find their ass-hole with both hands, mirrors, a map and a compass, or they’re corrupt as all shit themselves; demagogues pandering to pedestrian prejudices.
Again, I am sorry; I am in a mood…
Reply
:iconavanzile:
Striking piece. Interesting quote and sentiments. I've seen pictures of Peggy Guggenheim and she didn't look too horrible in some of them, I mean it wouldn't have been like fucking a bag lady.
Reply
:iconpaulocunha:
success is too often measured not by what you do,
but by who you screw.
Reply
:iconsadist-oldman:
i cant agree more with this. i tried to promote the idea of collaboration amongst the few handful artist i am an acquaintance of. not with me but amongst themselves.
The look of shock and awe to the suggestion of sharing credit, money and talent on their faces was priceless.
Reply
:icondeathofatragedy:
*DeathOfATragedy Jul 25, 2010  Hobbyist Digital Artist
It's sort of an onimous tribute to the surrealists who are being massacred by the likes of Andy Warhol and Thomas Demand. :)
Reply
:icongromyko:
~gromyko Jul 25, 2010  Professional Traditional Artist
precisely so...the living art is massacred by such an impending nihilism
Reply
:icondeathofatragedy:
*DeathOfATragedy Jul 25, 2010  Hobbyist Digital Artist
They are still great artists though.
Reply
Add a Comment: