The ShameFaced Remostrator (anagram of the massacre of modern art)
digital collaboration with George Tesseleneu of Romania George sent me the three layered skull and i build up the whole picture to place his piece on it...
My utter distaste for modern art, is now avenged....
fave here--->
____
'The important thing to remember in all this is that artistic talent had become, strictly speaking, non-essential. It helped, but promotion by a good publicist helped more. The artist had to be a showman rather than a skilled craftsman.
The ...successful contemporary artist needs to be a person devoid of moral scruples. Confidence trickster, hustler, prostitute, pimp, he needs to mix with the right crowd and know whom to cultivate. “The artist who would be known,” wrote the great folklorist Joseph Campbell, “has to go to cocktail parties to win commissions, and those who win them are not in their studios but at parties, meeting the right people and appearing in the right places.” Campbell was later accused of anti-Semitism, but Jewish artist Julian Schnabel backs up Campbell’s claim. “Much time is spent nurturing liaisons with creatures of the art world,” he notes gloomily. “There is no time for friendship. Later, there is no capacity for it.”How does a really talented artist succeed in such a rat race?Painter Helen Frankenthaler had to sleep with art critic Clement Greenberg, but it was worth it: Greenberg gave her good reviews. Willem de Kooning let his wife Elaine bed down with art critic Harold Rosenberg, but it was worth it: Rosenberg gave de Kooning good reviews. Jackson Pollock had to pleasure nymphomaniac Peggy Guggenheim, but it was worth it: her patronage helped to get Pollock good reviews. After all, her daddy owned the Guggenheim Museum. None of these artists slept around for love. They did it for money. Jackson Pollock famously said of Peggy Guggenheim, his plutocratic patroness: “To fuck her, you’d have to put a towel over her head. And she did want fucking.”Be prepared to prostitute yourself if you’re a woman or pimp your wife if you’re a man. Be prepared to do a Piss Christ like Andres Serrano or a pornographic Holy Virgin Mary like Chris Ofili. Be prepared, like Grayson Perry, to dress up as a woman and produce sexually perverted pots. Be prepared to pull a paper scroll out of your vagina like Carolee Schneemann. Be prepared, like Vito Acconci, to titillate a jaded public by masturbating for them in a prestigious art gallery — and calling it ‘art’. Let art critic Clement Greenberg have the last word: “I’ve decided the kind of people attracted to art are often psychopaths. You can quote me on that.” "
I guess it's about power as well. Power over the artist knowing they want to make a living from art and be willing to do everything for it. So they become a excentric playtoy that looks interesting for the incrowd of the artworld. On the other hand the artist probably knows this, it's just a big game that will be played by artists who are more interested in money then personal growth through there art.
I apologize in advance; I am in a mood this morning… I recently read some, yet More, criticism of modern art/artists, about how corrupt it all is, etc. My reaction to this is always the same: 1st, it is a logical fallacy to condemn the art work on the basis of one’s perceived business ethics of the creator of the art. If you don’t like the painting, fine, you don’t like the painting. Unless the painting is conveying a specific “message” in a literal sense that you object to, what difference does the artist’s business dealings have to do with it? Secondly, yeah, like art is a corrupt business, unlike other businesses, eh? I’m not so sure artists have the corner on the corruption market. I think people expect them to be like priests or holy people because they are artists, and they see their corruption as particularly hypocritical. I’m sorry, but I just get sick of that whole crappy argument! Then it follows that self-expression becomes a dirty or superficial term. Fuck these critics and their self-righteous, pseudo-intellectual, egotistical sermons on taste and ethics. They either couldn’t find their ass-hole with both hands, mirrors, a map and a compass, or they’re corrupt as all shit themselves; demagogues pandering to pedestrian prejudices. Again, I am sorry; I am in a mood…
Striking piece. Interesting quote and sentiments. I've seen pictures of Peggy Guggenheim and she didn't look too horrible in some of them, I mean it wouldn't have been like fucking a bag lady.
i cant agree more with this. i tried to promote the idea of collaboration amongst the few handful artist i am an acquaintance of. not with me but amongst themselves. The look of shock and awe to the suggestion of sharing credit, money and talent on their faces was priceless.
On the other hand the artist probably knows this, it's just a big game that will be played by artists who are more interested in money then personal growth through there art.
I recently read some, yet More, criticism of modern art/artists, about how corrupt it all is, etc. My reaction to this is always the same: 1st, it is a logical fallacy to condemn the art work on the basis of one’s perceived business ethics of the creator of the art. If you don’t like the painting, fine, you don’t like the painting. Unless the painting is conveying a specific “message” in a literal sense that you object to, what difference does the artist’s business dealings have to do with it? Secondly, yeah, like art is a corrupt business, unlike other businesses, eh? I’m not so sure artists have the corner on the corruption market. I think people expect them to be like priests or holy people because they are artists, and they see their corruption as particularly hypocritical. I’m sorry, but I just get sick of that whole crappy argument! Then it follows that self-expression becomes a dirty or superficial term. Fuck these critics and their self-righteous, pseudo-intellectual, egotistical sermons on taste and ethics. They either couldn’t find their ass-hole with both hands, mirrors, a map and a compass, or they’re corrupt as all shit themselves; demagogues pandering to pedestrian prejudices.
Again, I am sorry; I am in a mood…
but by who you screw.
The look of shock and awe to the suggestion of sharing credit, money and talent on their faces was priceless.